TELECOM ACCESS STANDARDS NEWSLETTER NO. 128

September 2001

CONTENTS
1. CDMA NETWORK TELEPERMIT PROCESS
2. PTC 331: 2001 NETWORK INTERCONNECTION USING ITU No. 7 SIGNALLING
3. NEWSFLASHES
4. ADSL MODEM PERFORMANCE DATA
5. ADSL LINE FILTER TESTING FACILITIES
6. JACKPOINT COATING MATERIALS AND PROCESSES
RETURN TO MAIN INDEX


1. CDMA NETWORK TELEPERMIT PROCESS

Telecom's new Code Division Multiple Access cellular network was launched in July with an initial range of four handsets. In the weeks prior to the launch, Telecom's Mobile company carried out network trials with these same handsets to make sure everything was working properly. At first, these trials applied as much to the network's own compliance with the industry standards, as they applied to the compliance of the handsets concerned.

Although a further two Telepermits have been granted since service launch, no information has yet been published on Telecom's requirements for Telepermitting CDMA handsets. This is because our technical staff are still working to refine all the relevant performance parameters and testing procedures. The current stage of CDMA is, in many ways, similar to that which applied for the first months of our "JetStream" ADSL services, in that Telecom is accepting any risk that some undiscovered handset incompatibilities might be revealed under actual service conditions.

Testing is being carried out "in-house" by a small team of specialists, which does not yet have the capacity to test all potentially suitable handsets. To provide some focus for their efforts, their work is being concentrated on a relatively small range of selected handsets that support the new network's features. This testing, currently being done at Telecom's expense, is also being used to develop the present lengthy test procedures into a more commercially applicable process, which will reflect the finally agreed network and service specifications.

Our network, which is IS 95B compatible, is being supplied by Lucent. The network will also support the earlier IS 95A mobiles, which are more readily available at this stage. Work is well in hand to draft Telepermit requirements for CDMA products, defining the various options within the TIA IS 95 air interface signalling protocol and related service specifications, such as SMS and WAP. These specifications are expected to be published within the next few months.

While the present team is not in a position to carry out testing for all comers, any company interested in supplying CDMA handsets, which are understood to be fully compatible with a Lucent CDMA network, is invited to submit samples to Telecom Mobile for an initial evaluation.

Where a sample has features which justify Telecom undertaking more detailed testing, arrangements may be made to include the model concerned in Telecom's current limited testing programme. More about this in a future Newsletter."



2. PTC 331: 2001 NETWORK INTERCONNECTION USING ITU No. 7 SIGNALLING

PTC 331, which deals with network interconnection using ITU No. 7 signalling has been revised to align with the current ITU Recommendations and with the template Interconnection Agreement now being used. The original version, written in 1992 had four amendments, but its Part A is well out of date. The same apples with PTC 301, written in 1989, and covering interconnection using the earlier Multi-Frequency Compelled (MFC) or ITU R2 signalling.

The original PTC 331 part A and PTC 301 have a lot of issues in common, so we plan to publish these as a single specification, referring to the specific signalling requirements in either PTC 301: 2001 or PTC 331: 2001, depending on the type of signalling to be used.

Parts A, B and C of PTC 331: 2001 have already been published on our website. These are available free of charge in "PDF" format. They cover the current Telecom implementations of the Message Transfer and ISDN User Parts of ITU No. 7 signalling, with optional provision for Signal Transfer Point operation.

Part A is much abridged in comparison with the 1992 edition. It now deals only with No.7 signalling system-specific matters. Pending publication of the revised PTC 300, it is recommended that new service operators wishing to set up interconnection with Telecom continue to use the 1992 version of Part A and, in the usual way, have an Appendix or schedule to the Interconnection Agreement to indicate any qualifications or exclusions from the text.

Multi-Frequency Compelled (MFC) or ITU R2 signalling is now little used and there is not much justification for its revision, other than to ensure that its requirements are consistent with any Interconnection Agreements based on its use. For this reason, it will not be dealt with until after PTC 300 has been revised.



3. NEWSFLASHES

Those accessing our website will have seen some "Newsflashes" over the past few weeks. We have decided to use these as a means of providing the industry with prompt up-dates or new information on CPE-related issues.

These Access Standards Newsletters have served us well since 1987, but a long-standing problem is gaining clearance for the publication of information often covering several subjects, each coming under the control of different groups within Telecom. Covering several issues per Newsletter means that other items may be delayed by a particular issue that has not been finalised.

Now that we are publishing on-line and do not need to assemble a complete Newsletter for printing and postage in the conventional way, we are going to make more use of these "Newsflashes" to make information available more promptly. The usual Newsletters will continue "in parallel" and, for the record, we will incorporate any Newsflashes into the next Newsletter following their publication.

Items 3 and 4 below, originally announced during May - August are thus included in this Newsletter.



4. ADSL MODEM PERFORMANCE DATA

ADSL Modem suppliers are now able to publish compatibility information for their modems on the Telepermit website. This information is supplied voluntarily, and there is no fixed format as to how or what information is supplied. The source of the information is acknowledged, and may be supplier/manufacturer statements or test information from independent Test Laboratories. At some future date it may be possible to define a uniform set of tests and accredit laboratories to do this work. This will depend upon whether the list of modem features keeps expanding or stabilises.



5. ADSL LINE FILTER TESTING

Harvest New Zealand Ltd and TeleLab Ltd are now accredited for testing to PTC 280:2001, Interim Telecom Requirements for Customer-connected ADSL Line Filters. Suppliers wishing to have ADSL Line Filters tested should contact Shane Harvey at Harvest on 0-6-370 1991, or Iain Whittet at TeleLab on 0-9-625 8200.

It is expected that ADSL line filters will become more widely available to customers over the next few weeks. In the meantime, work done in conjunction with Telecom indicates that there have been relatively few installations where it has not proved possible to use line filters and, so far at least, there have been no reports of radio interference at sites using filters.



6. JACKPOINT COATING MATERIALS AND PROCESSES

The 3M Company warned a year back that it would be withdrawing Fluorad FC 722 from the market worldwide and recommended that all users submit a "last order" to purchase a full year's production requirements. The aim was to tide them over pending the availability of a replacement compound.

Despite the warning, supplies have not yet ceased and jackpoint manufacturers have been able to continue to order Fluorad. Nevertheless, it still appears that 3M will discontinue production some time in the future, probably about mid-2002.

Telecom looked into other alternatives and contacted a UK manufacturer, Acota Ltd (previously named Layton Co Ltd), which manufactures a coating called "Certonal TL6x". As this has properties identical to those of Fluorad FC 722, we have defined this material as an accepted alternative for the production of Telepermitted 2-wire jackpoints.

However, some important developments came to light during our investigations after we had noted an apparent increase in failure rates relative to the original trials and were looking into reasons for this. What is now very clear is that full protection is only available by closely controlling not just the cleaning and coating, but also the drying process. Cleaning, drying and the subsequent dipping process have been found to be even more critical than was indicated in PTC 223. This applies, independent of whether the coating is Fluorad FC 722 or Certonal TL6x.

In almost all failures, corrosion occurs in the area each side of the BT 601A separator where the contact springs and lead wires emerge. Exposure of base metal due to cracking of the spring plating is also common in the same area, where the springs are subjected to the sharpest bending. It is thus particularly important that the coating adheres in these areas. Nevertheless, the coating will only adhere if the surfaces are thoroughly clean and dry.

The complex shape in this area makes it more difficult to clean effectively. It can also be much slower to thoroughly dry because of trapped water, then any trapped moisture or air makes it difficult to coat completely in this critical area while the jackpoint assembly is immersed in the coating compound.

Another key factor is close production control of the percentage of solids in the coating material. Too much and the coating does not enter any plating cracks, too little and the coating does not provide the needed level of protection. There is also the problem that post coating handling can damage the coating film, especially before it is totally dry.

These matters are being addressed in a revised specification, full details of which will be published on the Access Standards website in the near future.




DOUG BURRUS
Manager
Access Standards